7 landmines you hit when hiring overseas

The ultimate guide to hiring right from day 1

Read time: 4 min, 57 secs
Bookmark this.
If you hire or manage people this will save you MONTHS of headache.

Hey there - it's Brian šŸ‘‹

I just had a hard conversation with a client.

Their talent was failing.

We had 2 weeks to fix the issue.

Why?

The communication was horrendous.

But it actually wasnā€™t the talentā€™s fault.

See, their last company prioritized deep work (they wanted fewer updates).

So the talent ASSUMED thatā€™s how his new company operates.

Now the founder of the new company is the opposite.

He prioritizes iterations. So he needs rapid updates.

The founder ASSUMED thatā€™s how the talent knew to communicate.

The two had a rough start.

So we hit the emergency button to solve it.

How?

Iā€™ll share the solution at the end.

Todayā€™s issue is for you if you hire or manage a team.

We cover the mistakes that you make (without realizing it) when your new hire joins. Btw - the effects from these mistakes last for the lifetime of the hire.

šŸšØ Warning:
Itā€™s nerdy. Itā€™s in depth. But the next 5 min will save you MONTHS of headache.

Letā€™s dive in: šŸ‘‡

So what went wrong the first time?

Every time I see one I write it down to help future clients avoid potholes.

I found seven problems that come up consistently.

This client hit almost all of them.

And when you hit these problems, talent:
āžŸ Fails tasks
āžŸ Doesnā€™t communicate
āžŸ Doesnā€™t work with your values

I can get you the best talent in the world - but if their environment isnā€™t set up to succeed, theyā€™ll fail.

Ready for the problems? šŸ‘‡

7 landmines you hit when they hire overseas:

Mess these up and youā€™ll be frustrated with your talent:

Mistake 1: You make the role seem fun and easy during onboarding (then reality hits harder)

If you set expectations that itā€™ll be easy, theyā€™ll be demotivated when they find out itā€™s hard.

Instead, brace them for the challenge.

Make sure you let them know youā€™ll support them every step of the way.

Mistake 2: You donā€™t give talent resources to answer their own questions

You hired offshore to buy your time back and build leverage.

Leverage is when you do something once and the results last forever.

If you donā€™t build resources for them to answer their own questions, youā€™ll need to re-answer the question every time they forget (or you hire someone new).

Behind the scenes example (from TalentHQ):
I have an internal wiki that answers our team questions.

Anytime the team has a new question I ask the team to research the answer and put the answer into our wiki.

Thatā€™s leverage.

TalentHQā€™s internal ā€œhow-toā€ guides

Mistake 3: Your 1:1s are too short

Most people do 30-min 1:1s.

Too short.

Because if itā€™s that short, your team will make things quick and to the point.

Normally you want that.

1:1s have 3 main goals:
1) Fix talent issues (train + motivate)
2) Find problems in your business you donā€™t know about
3) Find problems with your leadership

Most people only think about fixing talent performance issues. If that was the only goal for a 1:1 is then it could absolutely last 30 min.

But itā€™s not.

āžŸ You need your team to tell you the real reason theyā€™re de-motivated.
āžŸ The hard truth about the problems in your business.
āžŸ The tough love in where your leadership isnā€™t great.

In a 30-min meeting, theyā€™ll feel cut short. They keep things to the point.

You wonā€™t find the problems deeply rooted in your business.

Mistake 4: You donā€™t train often because itā€™s an expense (not an investment)

Teach your team onceā€¦ theyā€™ll do it every day. For years.

Thatā€™s leverage.

But people only think about the time they spend training.

So they keep training sessions too short.

Talent doesnā€™t learn.

They get frustrated with the talent not improving.

At TalentHQ we do lunch & learns:
āžŸ How to communicate (with clients / internal)
āžŸ How to problem solve
āžŸ How we use tools (e.g., Notion, Asana, GHL)
etc.

To be clear;
If you can Google it, we wonā€™t talk about it.

We hire problem solvers. Itā€™s our core value.

BUT thereā€™s ā€œWays of Workingā€ thatā€™s unique to your business.

And if you get individuals rowing the wrong way the whole thing breaks.

Hereā€™s an example (from task management):
We use Asana:
āž¢ Do you chat about that task in Slack? or in Asana?
āž¢ Do you get them to agree to the task first? Or just assign it?
āž¢ What details do you need in the description so thereā€™s no back-and-forth?

Teach them how your team works, and everyone rows in unison.

Mistake 5: You keep onboarding too high-level (& ā€œassumeā€ clarity)

Aligning on expectations is uncomfortable.

Because you feel like youā€™re beating a dead horse.

I repeat myself. A LOT. And sit in the discomfort.

Ask awkward questions like ā€œwhat does this value mean to you?ā€

The opposite is just saying it out loud, no one remembers it. People ASSUME incorrectly. Then everyone is frustrated.

Want an example?

A core value at TalentHQ is speed.

Hereā€™s how most explain it to a new hire.

Most onboarding:
ā€œOur core value is speed. We want you to be as fast as you can. Got it?

Okay the next valueā€¦ā€

Onboarding at TalentHQ:
āžŸ Is speed different internal vs with clients?
āžŸ What does speed mean? Minutes? Hours? A day?
āžŸ How do we know which tasks need quality vs speed?
āžŸ Are default tasks done end-of-week? Or end-of-day?
āžŸ Is response time different based on channel (Asana vs email vs slack)?

Seriously.

šŸ§”šŸ»ā€ā™‚ļø Brianā€™s nerdy side rant:
It feels obnoxious. But you actually have the answers to the questions implied in your head.

Theyā€™re expectations that you donā€™t tell your talent. You just expect them to know.

Then people get frustrated when thereā€™s miscommunication.

Mistake 6: You only use ā€œon-the-spotā€ feedback

Itā€™s important to tell feedback on the spot.

But itā€™s just hard for you (& your talent) to remember all your feedback.

You just get frustrated when you repeat yourself.

So what I do is I keep a notepad with all the feedback Iā€™ve given.

Bucket the feedback into 3 improvement areas.

And go over the improvement areas on every 1:1 until itā€™s been solved.

Track progress to make sure the talent gets better with each session.

Mistake 7: You donā€™t let them know how they get fired

This one is uncomfortable.

If you fire someone without letting them know itā€™s coming, itā€™s your fault.

Your team feels itā€™s random. They worry it could happen to them. Everyone gets de-motivated. You lose trust with your team.

Itā€™s a mess.

You need to make the firing process clear.

And let them know youā€™ll give the talent fair warning for any ā€œfireable offenses.ā€

That means you tell them directly:
ā€œYour job is on the line. If you donā€™t fix XYZ in 3 weeks, you will get fired.ā€

Brutal conversation.

Everyone on your team needs to know:
1) What the fireable offenses are and
2) What the firing process is

Make the firing process clear from day #1 and they know itā€™s not random.

It keeps morale high and your team trusts you as a leader.

So how did we solve the clientā€™s talent issue?

The client hit most of the landmines when he hired his talent.

So we had to start over.

We ā€œre-onboardedā€ the talent.

The client called up the talent and said:

ā€œHey we didnā€™t set expectations right the first time. Letā€™s meet to clear expectation setting and define what success looks like here.ā€

Get onboarding wrong and you waste time micromanaging daily.

Get this right and your talent gets MORE than the results you want.

EVERY week.

52x a year.

Now thatā€™s leverage.

See you next Thursday šŸ‘‹

šŸ™‹ Vote: How did we do?

What did you think of today's edition?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.